rocket_launch ASAPilot
Get Started

Comparison

ASAPilot vs Splitmetrics Acquire

ASAPilot vs Splitmetrics Acquire — feature-by-feature comparison covering AI chat, automations, A/B testing scope, and pricing. Updated 2026-05-20.

Best for ASAPilot

  • • Teams focused exclusively on Apple Search Ads operations
  • • Operators who want AI chat for natural-language analysis
  • • Indie developers and small growth teams (1-20 apps)
  • • Read-only-by-default safety preference

Best for Splitmetrics Acquire

  • • Teams that need App Store A/B testing alongside ASA management
  • • Organizations running organic ASO experimentation in parallel
  • • Creative-heavy marketers testing icons, screenshots, descriptions
  • • Larger growth orgs with multi-tool workflows

Feature comparison

Feature ASAPilot Splitmetrics Acquire
Apple Search Ads management Core focus — audit, chat, automations One module within a broader marketing platform
AI chat Yes — natural-language access to 100+ ASA tools Not native to the Acquire ASA module
App Store A/B testing (organic) Not in scope — ASA only Yes — flagship feature for icon/screenshot/description testing
Creative testing tools Read-only assessment via account audit Active creative testing infrastructure
Read-only by default Yes — explicit approval per write Configurable
Setup time <2 minutes via ASA OAuth Longer — multi-product onboarding
Pricing entry Free + $39/month Quote-based; typically larger contracts
Multi-app portfolio 1 / 3 / 20 / 100 by plan Plan-dependent
Localized UI EN / ZH / JA / AR EN primarily
Automation templates Daily summary, CPI alert, waste sweep, etc. Available; broader scope across products
Reporting customization Account audit + ASAPilot AI chat Multi-dashboard layer across products

TL;DR

ASAPilot and Splitmetrics Acquire are not direct one-for-one competitors — they overlap on Apple Search Ads management but target different total scopes.

  • ASAPilot: Focused tool for ASA operations — audit, AI chat, automations.
  • Splitmetrics: Broader app marketing platform where ASA management is one module alongside App Store A/B testing, ASO experimentation, and creative testing.

If your need is purely ASA management, ASAPilot is leaner, cheaper, and AI-first. If you need ASA + organic ASO + creative testing in a single platform, Splitmetrics is the broader fit.


Where the two overlap (ASA management)

Both products manage Apple Search Ads campaigns. Within that scope:

DimensionASAPilotSplitmetrics Acquire
Audit speedApp-first parallel audit <60sMulti-dimensional reporting
AI chatNative, 100+ toolsNot in the Acquire module
AutomationsTemplates + custom triggersAvailable
Read-only modelDefault; explicit approvalConfigurable
Setup<2 minutesLonger (multi-product onboarding)

For pure ASA management, ASAPilot’s AI chat and faster onboarding are the differentiating strengths. Splitmetrics’ strength is the broader product surface.


Where Splitmetrics extends beyond ASAPilot

CapabilitySplitmetricsASAPilot
App Store A/B testing (organic)Yes — flagship featureNot in scope
Icon testingYesNo
Screenshot variant testingYesNo (audit only, not testing)
Description A/B testingYesNo
Creative libraryYesNo
ASO keyword researchYesSurfaced in ASA audits, not standalone ASO

If these capabilities are part of your stack, Splitmetrics may be the better single-tool choice — even if its ASA module is not as AI-driven as ASAPilot.


When ASAPilot is the better fit

  • Your team is focused on ASA, not full-funnel app marketing.
  • You want AI chat for natural-language analysis.
  • You operate at smaller scale (1-20 apps) and benefit from lower pricing.
  • You already have an ASO testing solution (Apple’s built-in PPO, AppTweak, or similar) and don’t need it bundled.

When Splitmetrics is the better fit

  • You need App Store A/B testing alongside ASA management.
  • You run multi-product app marketing workflows that benefit from a single platform.
  • You have a creative-heavy team that tests icons, screenshots, descriptions regularly.
  • You manage a larger organization with budget for higher-tier platform contracts.

Feature comparison

FeatureASAPilotSplitmetrics Acquire
Apple Search Ads management✅ Core focus✅ One module
AI chat✅ Native❌ Not in Acquire
App Store A/B testing❌ Not in scope✅ Flagship
Creative testing
Read-only by default⚠️ Configurable
Setup time<2 minLonger
Free plan
Pricing entry$39/moQuote-based
Localized UIEN / ZH / JA / AREN primarily

Using both

Many teams run both — Splitmetrics for App Store A/B testing and organic ASO, ASAPilot for ASA operations. The two products do not conflict because they integrate with different Apple APIs:

  • Splitmetrics integrates with App Store Connect for organic A/B testing
  • ASAPilot integrates with Apple Search Ads API for paid ASA operations

The pairing is common in growth orgs where the ASO team uses Splitmetrics and the paid team uses ASAPilot.


Decision test

  1. “Do I need App Store A/B testing alongside ASA management?” Yes → Splitmetrics (alone or paired with ASAPilot). No → ASAPilot.
  2. “Do I want AI chat for ad-hoc ASA analysis?” Yes → ASAPilot (alone or paired with Splitmetrics).

See pricing for ASAPilot plan tiers.