Glossary
Reattribution
Crediting an Apple Search Ads campaign for a returning user who already had the app installed (or had it installed previously) and re-engages via an ASA tap.
Also known as: Re-attribution, Reattributed install
What is Reattribution?
Reattribution is when Apple Search Ads credits a campaign for a returning user — a user who already had your app installed (or had it installed previously) and re-engages via an ASA tap.
It is the iOS equivalent of “re-engagement attribution” in the broader mobile ad ecosystem.
How reattribution works
Two scenarios trigger reattribution:
- User has the app installed. They search for it (or a competitor / category term), see your ASA ad, tap it, and open the app from there. The tap counts as a reattribution.
- User had the app installed, deleted it, then reinstalls via ASA. Apple still considers this a re-engaged user (not a brand-new install).
In both cases, the Apple Search Ads dashboard reports the event under “Reattributions” separately from “New Installs.”
Why reattributions matter
Reattributions are real value when:
- Subscription apps. A lapsed subscriber returning via an ASA tap and converting to a trial again has strong LTV implications.
- High-frequency utility apps. A user opening your app through an ASA tap is a session you might not have otherwise gotten — engagement metric value.
- Retargeting strategy. ASA can serve as an organic retargeting channel; reattribution counts measure that.
Reattributions are noise when:
- CPI / new-user growth metrics. Mixing reattributions into CPI inflates the apparent efficiency of campaigns that mostly catch returning users.
- Brand campaigns. Brand campaigns naturally catch returning users (people typing your app name). Reattribution share on Brand can be 30-60%; exclude it to see true new-user acquisition cost.
Where to find reattribution data
Apple Search Ads dashboard exposes reattribution in:
- Campaign-level reports (Reattributions column alongside New Installs)
- Ad-services API attribution payload (the
iad-purchase-dateand related fields indicate the type of event) - Apple Search Ads API reports (separate metric)
Most third-party tools (ASAPilot included) surface reattribution alongside new installs so you can choose to include or exclude per analysis.
Common interpretation mistakes
- Counting both reattributions and new installs in CPI. Inflates conversions; CPI looks better than it is.
- Excluding reattributions entirely from value calculation. Underestimates ASA’s true contribution to LTV.
- Comparing reattribution share across campaign types. Brand will always have higher reattribution share than Discovery; the ratio is meaningful within a campaign type, not across.
How ASAPilot helps
ASAPilot’s analytics layer reports new installs and reattributions separately so you can compute:
- New-install CPI (the strict efficiency metric)
- Total-conversion CPI (new installs + reattributions, for total value)
- Reattribution share per campaign (Brand vs Category vs Discovery)
This separation matters in account audits because a campaign with 80% reattributions behaves very differently from one with 10%.
See pricing.
Related terms
- SKAdNetwork — the cross-network attribution standard
- Ad Services API — the first-party ASA attribution API
- CPI — the metric reattribution inclusion changes